Differences between Partnership & HUF Business

A partnership comes into existence, by means of a contract between partners, whereas, a joint Hindu family (hereinafter referred to as HUF) arises as a result of status, i.e., by birth in the family. Accordingly, if two or more members of an HUF carry on an inherited business, it is not a partnership because it has been created by status or obtained by birth and not by an agreement.

HUF is a unique form of business existing only in India and is governed by the provisions of the Hindu Law. It comes into existence by operation of Hindu Law and not out of contract. The firm is owned by the members of undivided Hindu family, called co-parceners. The business of an HUF is managed by the senior-most male member, also known as Karta or Manager.

There are two schools of Hindu Law, namely,

  • Dayabhaga, and;
  • Mitakshara.

Dayabhaga It is applicable only to the states of West Bengal and Assam. According to this school, only the male members become heirs on the death of the father. Technically, HUF business is not possible under this system.

Mitakshara It is applicable to the rest of India. According to this school, a joint Hindu family consists of all persons including the wives and unmarried daughters lineally descended from a common ancestor. But only those persons constitute the firm who acquire by birth a coparcenary interest in the joint ancestral property, such interest belongs to three successive generations in the male line (son, grandson, and great grandson) who inherit the ancestral property immediately on their birth in the family. Thus, the property inherited by a Hindu from his father, grandfather and great grandfather is regarded as his ancestral property. The Hindu Law Succession Act, 1956 has extended the line of coparcenary interest to female relatives of the deceased coparceners and male relative claiming through such female relatives.

As the head of the joint family, the Karta has full control over business affairs of the family. He also acts as the custodian of the firm’s assets. His liability is unlimited, whereas, the liability of coparceners is limited to the value of their individual interests in the joint ancestral property. The death or insolvency of a coparcener or even that of the Karta does not affect the life of the business of the family. However, an HUF firm can be dissolved through mutual agreement among all the coparceners.

Differences between Partnership and HUF Business

The main points of differences between a partnership and HUF business are as follows.

1. Basis of formation

A partnership arises out of a contract between partners. Whereas an HUF arises by the operation of Hindu Law. It is created by status or birth in the family, no agreement is needed for it.

2. Regulating law

A partnership is governed by the provisions of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. An HUF business is governed by Hindu Law Succession Act.

3. Number of members

In a partnership business, the number of members cannot exceed 20 in case of non-banking business and 10 in case of banking business. But there is no such ceiling on the number of members (coparceners) in HUF.

4. Admission of new members

No new partner can be admitted to the existing partnership without the consent of all the other partners. In case of HUF firm, a person becomes a member (coparcener) merely by his birth.

5. Minor member

A minor cannot become a full-fledged partner in a firm; he can be admitted only to the benefits of partnership. In an HUF, a male child becomes a full-fledged member by birth.

6. Rights of females

In a partnership, women can become partners and they enjoy the same rights and privileges, as do male partners. In case of an HUF business, on the other hand, the membership is restricted to male members only. However, as per Hindu Law Succession Act,1956, a female relative of a deceased male member gets a coparcenery interest in the event of his death.

7. Implied agency

In a partnership, every partner has implied authority to represent the firm and bind the other partners by his acts. In HUF this right rests with the Karta only, other members may be allowed by Karta expressly or impliedly to contract debts on behalf of the firm.

8. Liability of members

In a partnership, the liability of all the partners is unlimited. Every partner is jointly and severally liable to third parties for the full debts of the firm. Whereas in case of HUF, liability of each member, except the Karta, is limited to the extent of his share in the property of the family.

9. Right to accounts

Each partner not only enjoys a right to inspect the books of account of the firm and demand a copy thereof, he can even demand the accounts of the past dealings. But a coparcener has no right to ask for the accounts of past dealings. He can ask for the position of the existing assets only.

10. Mode of dissolution

A partnership firm is dissolved on the insolvency or death of a partner. But the death, lunacy or insolvency of a coparcener does not affect an HUF. It continues to operate even after the death of a coparcener.

Leave a Reply

Recent Posts


Related pages

volunteer sampling strengths and weaknessesobjectives of cash budgetbuying motives definitiontypes of busnessbenefits of cinema advertisingwhat is deficit financing in economicsinternational marketing advantages and disadvantagesmarine cifdefine general damagesparagraph for precis writingobjectives and functions of international monetary fundadvantages of computerized accounting systemstatistical sampling theoryduties of bailorcustomer defection definitionstraight numeric filingcwc meaningdrawer on chequeimportance of operating cyclecluster sampling designdemocratic leadership advantages and disadvantageswhat is rbi and its functionsdematerialized formstratified sampling pros and consmarketing skimming pricingflexible budgeting definitionthree examples of an opinion leadercapital budgeting and its importancebreach of bailmentdishonor meansunderwritten sharesprojectised organisational structurelimitations of job analysisfinancial markets and intermediarieswhat is departmentation in managementdefinition of voidable contractadvantages and disadvantages of operating a franchisemoa of companysinking fund provisiondisadvantages of functional departmentalizationadvantages of deductive methodinvestment holding definitionbounties meaningmeaning of export marketingwhat is non bank financial intermediariesasset securitization meaningmerger disadvantagesdisadvantages of an oligopolydifference between hire purchase and leasing pptwhat is the role of sebithe maker of a promissory noteautocratic model of obdisadvantages of cash budgetunderwrite defautocratic leadership theoryequation for inventory turnoverinter connected stock exchange of indiawhat is zero based budgeting definitionequation for quick ratiocentralized purchasing systemjoint stock company common sealrandom sampling advantages and disadvantagesbenefits and drawbacks of e-commercedifference between current ratio and quick ratiodefinition salesmanrole of venture capitalistsfiling classification systemscash budget accountingthe term caveat emptor meansautocratic defintiondefine speculatorsabsorption of overheadsexample of a bilateral contractformal and informal group definitionwhat is meant by underwritingdefinition of capital expenditure budget